5/16/2023 0 Comments Fossil chronograph![]() The thinness of the case is matched by the thinness of the bracelet. I had an easier time changing the bracelet on this watch then I ever did on my Omega Seamaster.īut features aside I have to mention how much care has clearly gone into the design and then overall quality of the bracelet – this is actually something that’s going to be re-occurring throughout this write-up. Plus, this bracelet is a quick-change system, which is honestly a step-up from other traditional bracelet formats you’ll find on other way more expensive watches. The end links here are also solid and not cheap folded metal like you’ll find on other pieces in this price category. The two-tone matte and polish finish is done incredibly well (especially when compared to the Michael Kors Watch I recently reviewed, which featured a similar type of stainless steel plating). But the edges are finished extremely well. Does it do that weird rattle thing that cheap bracelets do when you shake them? Yup. But there’s a level attention and detail that’s nuanced and worthy of praise.ĭoes the bracelet material feel like a lesser quality stainless steel? Sure. Imagine my surprise when I discovered I didn’t hate this Fossil watch bracelet and that I in fact preferred to keep using it rather than swapping it out.ĭon’t get me wrong – I’m not going to sit here and tell you that you’re going to get a $1000 bracelet on a watch under $100. It’s just a given that you’re going to hate the bracelet and you should immediately prepare to swap it out with something else. Most watch enthusiasts who are as jaded and disillusioned as I have become immediately know that any bracelet under $100 is trash. The long protruding lugs with their unique almost architectural horn shape evoke an almost vintage style watch case. Honestly the shape of this timepiece is what originally drew me to it. When you sit and really look at the case, you can really appreciate these interplays.Īll of these different polishes and textures are accentuated by the unique shape of the Fossil Watches Minimalist. Then on top of that a polished fixed bezel holds the domed crystal in place. The underside of the watch is polished while some of the middle and lug-top features are matte. The main structure of the watch features an interesting blend of two-tone polished and matte features. The lug to lug is so bad that it sticks out past the width of my wrist (granted at 6.75 inches, I don’t have a large wrist). This low profile is slightly undercut but the timepiece’s overall dimensions. At only 7mm thin, this watch has a very low profile and sits very comfortably on my wrist. ![]() The minimalist line from Fossil Watches is characterized best by its thinness. ![]() So I opted for The Minimalist, one of the more popular 3 hand quartz movement stainless steel watch models from the brand, to use a representative of Fossil Watches’ build quality. The sheer number of models they have produced made it a bit daunting to figure out which one to review. So I wanted to put myself out there and take on this write up to really get a sense of the quality that Fossil Watches puts into their timepieces. Is the hate that watch collectors cast down on Fossil Watches justified? Is the brand putting out a subpar product for an over-inflated price tag to dupe the consumer? That’s what the watchfam usually states is one of the big issues with Fossil Watches. Fossil Watches “The Minimalist” Specs Case Dimensionsīut I’m always a strong believer in finding things out for yourself. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |